Changes to Victoria’s Bail Act 1977
Victoria’s bail laws are, without a doubt, the toughest in Australia. No one is more aware of that than our experienced bail application specialists. It has become increasingly difficult for us to get our clients bail, so we welcome the recent changes to the Bail Act 1977 (Vic), which took effect on 25 March 2024.
See here for more on ‘What is Bail?‘ and making a ‘Bail Application‘.
What does the Bail Amendment Act 2023 do?
The recent Bail Amendment Act 2023 (the Act), commenced on 25 March 2024, made further changes to the Bail Act 1977, seeking to ensure bail laws protect the whole community and better target the use of remand for cases where it is necessary to prevent an unacceptable risk to community safety.
The Act amended the Bail Act 1977 with consequential amendments to several other Acts to:
- Make changes to the bail tests applied and the factors that bail decision-makers must take into account when making determinations about bail;
- Repeal 2 offences; and
- Address remand of those accused of relatively low-level offending and the particular impacts that the Bail Act 1977 has on vulnerable cohorts, including Aboriginal people and women (see the Explanatory Memorandum).
Background to bail amendments
In 2017, when James Gargasoulas murdered six people and injured many others using his motor vehicle, he was on bail. Consequently, the Victorian Government changed the law to make it more difficult for repeat offenders to get bail, leading to a significant spike in the number of prisoners being held on remand.
Initially thought to be an effective measure in protecting the wider community, the amendments targeted many of our community’s most vulnerable members, resulting in them being remanded for matters that would not ordinarily attract a term of imprisonment.
In his second reading speech, Mr Anthony Carbines stated:
“We know that the changes we made have had a disproportionate impact on people who were already experiencing significant disadvantage, with a particular impact on Aboriginal people, people with disabilities, children and women. Ultimately, the net was cast too wide.”
The case of Ms Veronica Nelson
The recent amendments to the Bail Act 1977 were sparked by findings into the death of Veronica Nelson delivered at the Coroners Court on Monday, 30 January 2023. Ms Veronica Nelson was a 37-year-old Gunditjmara, Dja Dja Wurrung, Wiradjuri and Yorta Yorta woman.
Ms Nelson was due to appear at the Melbourne Magistrates Court after her arrest in December 2019. The Court, however, did not get to her case on 30 December and was subsequently stood over until 31 December 2019, when Ms Nelson made her own unrepresented application for bail, on the advice of a lawyer, to preserve her right to a legally represented bail application later. Bail was refused. Ms Nelson was required to show exceptional circumstances to justify a bail application because she was charged with breaching bail. She had also failed to appear in court for shoplifting offences and was accused of having committed a further similar offence.
Ms Nelson died alone in custody on 2 January 2020 from a rare gastrointestinal condition, suffering from opiate withdrawal and malnutrition while she was remanded in custody for a crime for which she would never have received a term of imprisonment. Ms Nelson’s death was found to be preventable.
As stated by Mr Carbines in his second speech: “The coronial inquest into Veronica’s death found that the bail system has a discriminatory impact on Aboriginal people resulting in grossly disproportionate rates of remand, with the most significant impact being on Aboriginal women.”
Summary of bail amendments
Repeal of Bail Act offences | The Bail Amendment Act 2023 repealed two offences under the Bail Act 1977: The offence of failure to appear on bail is retained. |
Bail reforms for children | The amendments provide that the reverse onus test applies to children differently than adults, applying in fewer circumstances for children. There are exceptions to this for murder and other homicide offences. As with adults, the reverse onus bail test also applies to children accused of terrorism offences who pose a terrorism risk or who have a terrorism record. Section 3B(1) of the Bail Act 1977 has been expanded and includes the following factors, which a bail decision maker must take into account:
|
Considerations for Aboriginal people | Following consultation with Aboriginal communities, s3A of the Act now gives greater guidance to the bail decision maker when making decisions regarding an Aboriginal person or child by setting out factors that make an Aboriginal person particularly vulnerable in the criminal justice system. The amendments recognise the unacceptable overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in custody and seek to ensure that the rates of incarceration for Aboriginal people are not further compounded unless there is good cause to do so (HA (a pseudonym) [2021] VSCA 64). Section 3A(1) requires consideration of:
S3A also requires a bail decision maker to identify and record the relevant matters they took into account when refusing bail to an Aboriginal adult or child to ensure they engage meaningfully with the considerations. |
Restricted remand for summary offending | The amendments prohibit remand for a person accused only of offences under the Summary Offences Act 1996, subject to exceptions. The prohibition on remand does not apply if the person has a terrorism record or is accused of a serious, violent or sexual offence listed in Schedule 3 (s4AAA). The “double uplift” provision, which made it more difficult for people who committed an offence while on bail to be granted bail for a new offence, has been abolished. The reforms mean that people will not be remanded in custody for offences unlikely to result in a prison sentence. Remand is, however, still available for serious summary offences of violent and sexual nature. For minor offences, accused persons may be placed on bail subject to conditions and face bail being revoked if conditions are not complied with. |
Considering the likelihood of imprisonment | Section 3AAA(1) now requires bail decision makers to consider whether the accused is likely to be sentenced to a term of imprisonment when applying the reverse onus test or unacceptable risk test. |
Making a second bail application | The new provisions allow a legally represented person to make a second bail application without the need to establish new facts and circumstances (s18AA). |
Other changes to bail | The amendments rectified anomalies in the application of bail tests by:
The amendments also:
|