Under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), the Court may
The Court can only take the above course if it is satisfied that one or all of the criteria in 19B(1)(b)(i) – (iii) are met and that it is satisfied that it would be inexpedient to inflict any punishment or to inflict any punishment other than a nominal punishment, or that it is expedient to release the offender on probation.
Since the decision handed down by Chief Justice Spigelman in the case of Baffsky in 2001, this is now commonly known in legal circles as the two-stage test.
For sentencing in relation to Victorian offences and to understand what is a good behaviour bond under Victorian State law see here.
Step 1 the court must be satisfied that one of the following factors is made out to the requisite standard;
(i) the character, antecedents, age, health or mental condition of the person; or
(ii) the extent (if any) to which the offence is of a trivial nature; or
(iii) the extent (if any) to which the offence was committed under extenuating circumstances; and
Step 2 the Court must be satisfied of the following;
In making this assessment the Court must consider the ordinary factors that arise in s16A of the Criminal Code together with considerations of general deterrence.
In a Nutshell
Whilst a person may satisfy one or all three of the factors outlined in step 1 , if they do not satisfied the magistrate or judge in relation to step 2, which involves an assessment of the considerations set out in 16A of the Crimes Act 1914, the magistrate or judge cannot exercise their discretion in favour of the defendant.
19B has been considered by the superior courts on numerous occasions and the following propositions are now accepted in the case law;
(i) Loss of driver’s licence resulting in significant business hardship see Re Stubbs (1947)
(ii) Aged defendant who is charged with the responsibility of caring for an aged sibling Cobiac v Liddy (1969)
(iii)Inability to pay substantial fine – Customs v Grills (1992) 110 FLR 431
It should be noted that the provisions of 19B can apply to a corporations, see Lanham v Brambles – Ruys Pty Ltd (1984) 37 SASR 16
The bottom line in relation to 19B is this, sentencers have been imbued with significant discretion in relation to interpreting and applying the meaning of extenuating circumstances.
It also important to note that under the commonwealth sentencing scheme, it is not open to the court to impose a without conviction disposition in relation to any offence unless section 19B is enlivened. This is now particularly pertinent when one considers the application of the Spent Conviction Legislation and the potential to avoid a criminal record.
“Security” refers to the pledge the person put on bond without conviction gives to the Court that they will meet the required conditions. In practice, security is usually a sum of money. If the person fails to meet the bond conditions, they forfeit the sum of money.
A “surety” is someone who agrees to pay a sum of money in the event the person put on bond doesn’t meet the conditions set.
In practice, a court almost never requires a surety for a bond.
Potential Bond Conditions
Monetary conditions
Probation
Other bond conditions
Have you been charged with a commonwealth offence in Victoria?
Search